The Perks of Being a Wallflower 2 (Last Post)

"'But you  weren't, Charlie. At those times you weren't being a friend at all. Because you weren't being honest with him.'" (201) In this part of the book, Sam shows Charlie that you need to put part of yourself into any relationship because to withdraw your personality from the world will never result in a true friendship. You always need to be true to yourself, even if it means coming out of your shell to share yourself with others. 

Throughout the book, Charlie goes with the flow. He never protests change- even if it feels wrong to him. He's never interested in having any aspirations. I would describe him as "here and now". I find it interesting that he only expresses himself through his letters. He is introduces to the Rocky Horror Show, 

But Charlie didn't have many ideas, or specific ways or principles. I have no idea whether or not if hat's the type of attitude that is best, but I know that dreams, and accomplishing them is satisfying, and some people need a goal to work towards. In the end, it's knowing what you want to do- and how you want to do it. Expression is how we portray ourselves, but how to do it is something important when coming of age. 

It's always important to feel comfortable- around friends, around family. To not be a 'yes man' and to stand up for what you believe in, even if someone differs in opinion. Charlie feels inclined to agree with everything a friend says in order for them to think well of him; "'…It's sweet and everything but it's like you're not even there sometimes. '" (201) Sam is telling Charlie that he needs to have his own personality to communicate- because people need companionship, and not just someone who doesn't care about themselves enough to be there for someone- as an other human being. Often, you have to be prepares to lead instead of follow. 

I think that Charlie's side plot with Bill was interesting because it showed how Charlie could express himself, but only when he felt comfortable enough to do it. Not being true to yourself is always common, mainly in small ways that build up. Telling a white lie to agree with a friend, or even something more drastic, like altering your dream or aspiration to, say, go to the same school with a friend. But in the end, your life doesn't just revolve around your social life. There is an entire world that you can create by yourself, filled with goals and dreams. Life is more than just other people- it's about you, too.  

 

The Perks of Being a Wallflower - Coming of Age Post

Everyone makes the journey from childhood to adulthood, but the voyage is almost never smooth. In the midst of everything, it's easy to be influences by others, in either negative of positive ways. But these people always have expectations that affect us. These people always have actions that affect us. And these people always have opinions that affect us.

Charlie is exposed to liquor, cigarettes, drugs, almost causally throughout the story. In the beginning of high school, Charlie hangs out with seniors. Charlie never seems scared of trying drugs or alcohol, "The party was in the basement of this house. The room was quite smokey, and the kids were much older. There were two girls showing each other their tattoos and belly button rings. Seniors, I think" (34). I feel like that represents a characteristic of Charlie- that he goes with the flow. In his letters, Charlie addresses shadier parts of teenage culture with a calm mien.

Charlie is easily influenced throughout the story. Charlie does not refuse drugs and alcohol because he is afraid, but because he simply considers it unpleasant. "…especially after I said no to having a beer. I once had a beer with my brother when I was twelve, and just didn't like it. it's really that simple for me." (34) But then, Charlie will take advantage of the resources. I do not believe he is one to refrain when it comes to what all of his friends are doing. After he met Sam and Patrick, he changed, "'Charlie, smoking. I can't believe it.'" (119) His sister was surprised as Charlie's behavior shifted.

Peer pressure is an interesting concept. Many kids are influenced by their friends to take part in illicit acts. In The Perks of Being a Wallflower, Charlie is never pressured, but changed. He is opened up to new experiences, in a sense. I wonder if this is the way most things fall pat.

3 Posts in One- Spring Break!

Reflection on Reading Responses: 
Jamila 
The Catcher in the Rye 


I found Jamila's response interesting for many reasons. First of all, I liked the book, The Catcher in the Rye   a lot when I read it. I found the plot interesting, with a subtle but entrancing character and character change.


The reason I liked Jamila's post was her focus. Jamila focused on one of the most interesting parts of the book. Not only is Mr. Antolini the only teacher that Holden looks up to, but Mr. Antolini changes the mindset that Holden carrys around throughout the book. I thought that Jamila's focus around Mr. Antolini's impact on both Holden and the plot of the book was artistically supported. As the classic by J.D. Salinger draws to a close, Jamila's thesis sheds an interesting light on Holden's and Mr. Antolini's relationship.


Joyce 
The Hunger Games 


I liked Joyce's post on The Hunger Games, because it analyzed and highlighted a complete realm of the book. Personally, I do not like love triangles. But I have noticed a theme of them in our society. The Twilight Saga, was a popular book about a love triangle. Since then, I have noticed many "team's" and more recently, team Gale and team Peeta.


I had never really looked carefully at the love triangle in The Hunger Games until reading Joyce's post, and I love how the plot of the Hunger Games is intertwined with the dramatic love triangle. Joyce's post notes, "He has risked his life for Katniss many times and has always stood by even if he wash't physically or mentally prepared for the challenge."I had never thought about Peeta that way before.  


Some ways that I would like to improve my blog posts is I would like to do some compare/ contrast essays like Joyce did. I would like to make a structured and long conclusion like Jamila. 




Reflection on Plagiarism


In the paragraph, the student could have put quotations around the passage and citied the source instead of implying that the text was his/her own. 


Something the student could have written instead could be: 
As one looks at Van Gogh's piece, "there is a peaceful essence flowing from the structures. Perhaps the cool dark colors and the fiery windows spark memories of our own warm childhood years filled with imagination of what exists in the night and dark starry skies. The center point of the town is the tall steeple of the church, reigning largely over the smaller buildings. This steeple casts down a sense of stability onto the town, and also creates a sense of size and seclusion." (A Brief Understanding of the Starry Night Paintings, http://www.vangoghgallery.com/painting/starryindex.html) 


3 ways to avoid plagiarism are to use a quote, a paraphrase, or a summary. 


Non-fiction Article Response 
National Geographic, March 2012 
Rhino Wars by Peter Gwin 


Rhino horns are believed to have medicinal purposes in many Asian cultures, and promise an overwhelming revenue on the black market. Many people buy rhino horns to heal life threatening conditions, despite the the horrifying toll on the species. The theory should be tested for modern medicine. 


There are many conflicting statements consulting the rhino horn, "Although a number of Vietnamese doctors I spoke with said rhino horn was not an effective cure for anything, let alone cancer, several other respected physicians claimed rhino horn could be part of an effective cancer treatment." No tests concerning the efficiency of rhino horns have been conducted yet.  


Many people, when confronted with a life or death situation are more likely to buy rhino horns off the black market. One of the people interviewed in the article, when asked whether or not she would try rhino horn in response to possible cancer found during a mammogram, replied, "'…when you think you might die, it can't hurt to try it.'" People are willing to try almost anything when a loved one's life or their own life is threatened. The psychology of cultural and ancient medicine is almost as powerful as a real cure. One oncologist states, "'Belief in a treatment, especially one that is wildly expensive and hard to get, can have a powerful effect on how a patient feels.'" The human mindset can lead to demand for rhino horns. 


Rhinos are endangered animals, and the medicinal need for horns is without scientific explanation. The Wild Javan Rhinoceros was declared extinct in 2010. 30 Javan's exist in captivity in Indonesia today. When poachers come across a rhino, they put a bullet  through the animal's brian, and then use a penknife to harvest the two horns on the snout. The majestic rhino is now a disfigured carcass, cast away for the scavengers of the savannah. The rhino's numbers are dwindling. Rhino horns can fetch up to $133 a gram, "…which at top end is double the price of gold and can exceed the price of cocaine." Rhino horns are incredibly rare, and the promise of the nearly blind rhino's horns being wroth tens of thousands of dollars is driving rhino's to extinction. 


A compromise could be reached if tests were conducted. If it is proven that the rhinoceros horn is indeed a life saving antidote, then rhinoceros farming could take place. Rhino horns grow back and by taking a controlled amount of the horn, the rhino can still reproduce and the species could be saved from extinction. If it is proven that the rhino horn actually has no real medicinal purpose then the demand for the horn's will go down. Many animals are endangered today, and for many it is because of poachers. Rhinoceros are not the only animal that suffers from poaching and ruthless trade.     

Reflection to Much Ado About Nothing

Dear May Dup,

I recently saw Much Ado About Nothing, and I really enjoyed it.

The acting was good- I noticed that both Claudius and Beatrice were great- they acted even when they weren't talking and I could really see them as their characters. The set was also nice. It was subtle but intriguing and the way the actors interacted with their surroundings was joyful and fun.

I especially liked the plot, and I was surprised at how easy it was for me to follow it during the performance. Maybe it was the pre-preformance workshop, maybe the acting was much better than I expected, but many details about the play fell into place, and I didn't develop many major questions. I loved seeing a comedy- because the only other Shakespeare plays I was familiar with were tragedies such as Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet and Hamlet and I haven't really known many comedies since just this year as we preform A Midsummers Night Dream in drama and now Much Ado About Nothing.

I'll be sure to see more of Shakespeare's comedies in the future,  but until then,

Sadie  

75% done with Insomnia by Stephen King

In many Stephen King books, I noticed a recurring theme of fear, but in Insomnia, King has enunciated the theme throughout the book. In horror novels, this aspect is not uncommon, but it is interesting what is frighteningly grotesque. What is the definition of the abnormally terrifying?

There have been many times in the book when disgusting bugs have dwelled.The image of outstanding horror is carefully outlined in the writing, and the theme of black, oily, cockroach-like bugs is an obvious theme. In times in dreams, [viewer discretion advised] "Carolyn! he screamed. He put his hands out to her, then pulled them back, terrified of the black bugs, which were still spewing out of her head... One of Carolyn's eyes popped out and lay in the sand like blueberry jelly. Bugs vomited from the now empty socket." (241) and when the main characters are 'up' (above the normal world in a place of immortality), "Giant bugs that looked like prehistoric trilobites were squirming in and out of the evergreens in droves, crawling over each other, bumping heads, sometimes rearing up and pawing at each other…a rainbow of guts spewed out of it, and a waxy-white substance that looked like stale mashed potatoes. Ralph had an idea the white stuff had been eggs." (598) the grotesque details do not belong to our world but something just under the surface, and these bugs seem to be a recurring part of these details.

An other example of horror in Insomnia is the way King describes Atropos, the 'villain' who is responsible for random death in the story. In this way, King looks at the psychopathic ways of a serial killer- disgustingly ominous and painfully harmful. The ways of Atropos are expressed, "I don't know about the other two, but doc #3 (Atropos) is one crazy medic-- and he takes souvenirs. Takes them the way some of the crazies in Vietnam took ears" (374) Stephen King uses comparison and allusion to outline horror, and uses tools like insanity and disgust to outline pure fear.


It's interesting to me how fear works- what its created from. Stephen King uses fear with a skill- almost as though it's a science. This is the same thing other creators used, such as Alfred Hitchcock and his famous suspense.       

Letter about Shakespeare Act 1 Scene 1

Dear May Dup,

I just read Act 1 Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet by Shakespeare, and it was great. The text was foreign but interesting, and I can't wait to finnish the play. As discussed in an earlier post, the writing of Shakespeare is beautiful in many ways, but by reading the past few pages of Romeo and Juliet I have been enlightened to the other wonders of his work.

An interesting thing that Shakespeare does is use puns in his language. An example of a pun is: "There was a man who forgot how to throw a boomerang. Don't' worry, it came back to him. " The use of puns is an interesting detail, easily missed if you are unfamiliar with the text. Romeo and Juliet observe innocent misunderstandings,

"Sampson: Gregory, on my word we shall not carry coals.

  Gregory: No, for then we shall be colliers."(Page 9, Line 1-2)

Sampson uses the phrase: 'carry coals' to describe being humiliated, but Gregory perceives it as describing a way of work.

Another interesting thing Shakespeare does is tweak language so that connections must be made in order to understand it. An example of this is, "Benvolio: Madam, an hour before the worshiped sun peered forth the golden window of the east, a troubled mind [drove] me to walk abroad, where underneath the grove of a sycamore that western rooteth from this city side, so early walking did I see your son. Towards him I made but he was 'ware of me and stole into the covert of the wood…" I notice that in order to comprehend this passage, I knew that the sun rises in the east, so Benvolio said it was an hour before dawn, and I knew that a sycamore was a tree. I was pleased that I was able to apply my own knowledge to my reading. 

I’m sure that I will find many more details to love and appreciate about Shakespeare on this exotic journey. I would recommend you read Shakespeare, but you should read with others so you catch things you would have missed. Until then I will be gracious for the paraphrasing on the left side of the page. 

Bye for now, 

Sadie  

Writing about Poetry: Anne Sexton

The Starry Night, a poem by Anne Sexton has an intricate meaning based off of the painting by Vincent Van Gogh. Her poem identifies with Van Gogh's message. 

Anne Sexton amplifies Van Gogh's work with beautiful, flowing words and vivid imagery. She uses unique verbs and adjectives to portray a surreal feeling, much like the one Van Gogh portrays in his work. Sexton's writing absorbs the images of the painting, "It moves. They are all alive.\ Even the moon bulges in it's orange irons\ to push children, like a god, from it's eye." (7-9) I notice how Sexton uses alliteration, personification, and simile constantly throughout her piece- and in that way, she achieves an image of the poem- a message that is resistant to a final understanding. 

Sexton uses repetition in the poem. She ends two of the three stanzas with: "Oh starry starry night! This is how\ I want to die." (5-6, 11-12) I feel that she relates to Van Gogh, or at least to how she perceives him. Both Sexton and Van Gogh show a similar thought- while morbid, that death is upon them, and that to embrace the heavens is to embrace reality, religion, and serenity. 

Anne Sexton conceals a beauty within her words that enhance the message of Vincent Van Gogh's Starry Night. I love how a surreal aspect of her poem is completely relatable. I wonder if Anne Sexton's work usually carries this emotion.           

Sonnet: The Realm

A light caresses objects in a space
flimsy pictures tell an old story
and while my stories never wear a face
I live in this room to bethink my glory

From a secret realm, from a sacred dream
it formed a world into infinity
it crossed the border of our earth to gleam
in a new realm a baby world can be

The end of this world was quick and corrupt
the pure dream sputtered away like a light
and when the vibe was gone the realm would erupt
the world would fall into an endless night

The fake love saved what remained: a crescent
but the synthetic moon shined florescent

3 Poems

Poetry is:

A plain of barren grass
icy mountains look like broken glass
but to love this land is to amass
a crystal breeze and golden trash

A foggy, dream-like shower
that grows in your mind like a rising flower
and to love this touch is a soaring power
that feeds your mind and makes it grow louder

An underwater sound
that makes your body race and pound
and to abandon this light is to die on the ground
so travel through sleep and write to be found

Question format in response to Harlem by Langston Hughes

Where did a dream go?
it died and was forgotten
six feet under,
but with no cross to mark it's slumber

Where did a night go?
dawn was always seeping at the corners
it dissolved into the universe,
stealing secrets from a broken curse

Where did a life go?
it was thrown into a cycle
it followed every other road
a substantial place but nothing to show

Reaction to Art: The Persistence of Memory by Salvador Dali

The memories are persistent
a sour thought
and then you've been caught
in a paradox remaining resistant

The time is limp and lame
a trapped sensation
is still and surreal occasion
in a world that feels like sharp shame

The shadows are fundamental
a space wrapped with mystery
a face warped through history
in a night that is stained sentimental.

Writing About Art: Salvador Dalí

When I read Duma Key, by Stephen King, the name Salvador Dalí passed by my gaze unrecognized. King made many allusions to Dalí throughout the novel. Now that I am learning about Dalí and his surreal style, I notice how his work is meaningful and interesting. The book Duma Key wade many references to Dalí, "Uh-huh. In any case, I tell no lie about Dalí. He stayed in your house for three weeks in nineteen eighty-one."(122) Further in the book, they continue to refer to Salvador Dalí. I think they do this because the work of Dalí was surreal and scrambled, many components stitched together to create one immortal image.    

The picture on the book jacket of Duma Key, by Stephen King     

                                                     

                                       

        "The Persistence of Memory" by Salvador Dalí 

       

This piece was so intriguing to me. In this picture, I notice the theme of death, just transparent enough to be hidden under the surface. I see that everything is enveloped in shadow, and that time is on top of and dominates the picture. The painting was created in 1931.

I feel that the title, "The Persistence of Memory" refers to how time can melt away when your thoughts are elsewhere. When you can close your eyes, and for moments, your mind separates from your body and you are completely alone. I move how the surreal aspect of the painting makes me think of my thoughts- where the mystery of the human brain presents itself and reviews the world in a dream-like and liquid matter.

The memories are persistent
a sour thought
and then you've been caught
in a paradox remaining resistant

The time is limp and lame
a trapped sensation
is still a surreal occasion
in a world that feels like sharp shame

The shadows are fundamental
a space draped in mystery
a face warped through history
in a night that is stained sentimental


I think that surrealism is an interesting image to capture. I like the idea of tweaking a realistic picture to create something that is surprisingly human. Dalí's work is very dream-like, and dreams are so mysterious. Looking into one on Dalí's paintings is like looking into an alternate universe, where an expression fills up a picture with intricate details.

Almost Done With Delores Claiborne

Delores Claiborne was a really interesting book- about choices. All throughout the book Delores makes decisions- decisions that didn't always seem like the easy way out. The decisions were always interesting, mainly because as she became more experienced, her sense changed. She started doing what had to be done, instead of what seemed easier.

In the beginning, Delores wouldn't put much thought behind her decisions; "I had six weeks' worth of baby girl in my belly when I told him I did n I would, until death do us part. And that was the saddest part of it...sad but true. The rest of it was all the usual stupid reasons, and one thing I've learned in my life is stupid reasons make stupid marriages. I was tired of fighting with my mother. I was tired of bein scolded with my father. All my friends were doing it, they was gettin homes of their own, and I wanted to be a grownup like them; I was tired of bein a silly little girl."(56) Delores didn't put any thought into her marriage, and that one mistake taught her to be more careful when it came to life decisions. It's interesting how that one mistake formed the rest of her story. Without it, her life would be so different. I wonder if she would have changed it if she could.

Later on, Delores put more thought into her actions. She was careful- when McAuliffe was questioning her, Delores would count to three in her head before she answered each question, "Doin that might keep me from movin to quick and paying for it by falling into one of the pits he'd dug for me."(236) Delores thought out everything. When she found out that Joe had stolen the kids college fund, she spent months trying to figure out how to react to the information.

Delores changed. Throughout the book, Delores learned from her mistakes, and didn't make them twice. Many times she said: "fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."(32, 38) The character change is really interesting, and I admire Delores for it.

The Forces of Stephen King

After reading 4 (and a half) of his books, I am noticing that in each one, there is an overruling force that guides the characters, to or from evil. This theme is interesting to this genre. In every book, the characters do not have a will of their own.

In The Stand, each force was powerful in its own way. The good force was gentle, and brought the truly good survivors to be together and grow as a civilization. The alternative force, the evil force exploited someones misgivings. These misgivings were exploited until the misgivings grew into hate, and that hate was used and controlled. But if you weren't good, you were brought to Las Vegas with no will of your own.

In The Shining, the force was the hotel. The hotel tempted Jack to drink, to kill. "'I believe you must take it up with your son, Mr. Torrance, sir. He understands everything, although he hasn't enlightened you. Rather naughty of him if I may be so bold, sir. In fact, he's crossed you at every turn, hasn't he? And him not yet six.''Yes,' Jack said. 'he has.' There was another wave of laughter from behind them. 'He needs to be corrected, if you don't mind me saying so. He needs a good talking-to, and perhaps a bit more. My own girls, sir, didn't care for the Overlook at first. One of them actually stole a pack of my matches and tried to burn it down. I corrected them. I corrected them most harshly. And when my wife tried to stop me from doing my duty I corrected her'"(533) The hotel was slowly manipulating Jack, and it terrified Wendy and Danny, while it took Jack's body and mind and used him to control everything.

In Misery, it was Annie. If you see a previous post (Misery: part one, metaphor) Paul refers to Annie as the goddess- an immortal, ever powerful being with only one objective: to torture, to destroy, to corrupt, to detain. Paul became scared and weak.

In Pet Cemetery, it was the burial ground. In this book, the power was amplified. "'this place has a power, Louis...it's been full of power before, and I'm ascared it's coming round to full again'"(397)

It's interesting how the manipulation, the telepathy, the power works. The characters never question it- it was always there, so why be surprised? It's interesting that it works, and how it works, and slowly the time falls into place, and then it ends. I wonder what it shows about our society- books are depictions of our society after all,but what does it mean after wards? To me, it speaks that there always was a power, and we do not control anything. It will end, and the ending is unpredictable, and we cannot control it.

1/2 way through Duma Key by Stephen King

"I was thinking of how I'd started my time on Duma Key with one assumption-- that I had chosen the place-- and since come to believe that it had chosen me..."(248) In my book, Duma Key by Stephen King, Edgar Freemantel was injured in an accident that resulted in the loss of his right arm, as well as his marriage. He then moved to Duma Key, and is slowly finding out that there is more to the island than what meets the eye. I notice that the characters refer to their life before coming to Duma Key as their 'other life'. I  think is shows how separate the two ways are (the organized, vivid but painful life prior to the island, verses the flowing majestic, healing ways of Duma Key.) I think it's interesting how the characters are adapting to their  new surroundings. 

Edgar Freemantel's change took place slowly. When he first came to Duma Key he was not much different than how he is now. He  had already come to terms with his divorce, and was continuing his life. But i do notice that he is more accepting of the power of the island. He knows that he has to listen to the itch, (the phantom itch that he feels in his missing arm) He knows that what comes from his paintings are powerful, and that he needs to nurture his gift;  "The itch in my missing arm deepened. By now it felt almost like a friend." (253) Edgar also understands much more than he used to, "I thought of painting in Little Pink while The Bone pumped out hardcore rock and roll in thick chunks. I thought of the Great Beach Walks. I even thought of the Baumgarten kid yelling Yo Mr. Freedmantel, nice chuck! when I spun the frisbee back to him. Then I thought of waking up in the hospital bed, how dreadfully hot I had been, how scattered my thoughts had been, how sometimes I couldn't remember my own name. The anger. The dawning realization (it came during the Jerry Springer Show), that a part of my body was AWOL. I has started crying and had been unable to stop. 'I wouldn't change it back' I said, 'in a heartbeat.'" (293)  Edgar hadn't changed in many ways, but he new that he belonged on Duma Key. 

Wireman is Edgars friend, and had also undergone a trauma to the brain. Wireman shot himself in the head after his wife and only child died in separate accidents on the same day. But now, Wireman, once dismally depressed from the tragedy, now recognizes that all he can do is live the rest of his life to the fullest; "'That man was so hurt and lost he really wasn't responsible. This is my other life, and I try to look at my problems in it as...well...birth defects.'"(233) Wireman slowly recovered from his 'birth defects' 

I think Duma Key changes a character in many ways. In most Stephen King books there is an overlying power that is dominant over the characters. In Duma Key, It's the island, and the change in characters are foreshadowed and show in Edgar's painting. I wonder what changes will occur later on in the story, and I wonder how those changes will effect the plot and climax. 

  

Environmental Disruption--Oil Drilling and Fracking

Hydraulic fracture-drilling (fracking) is a process that is executed for the sake of natural gases that can be used for energy. It creates jobs and opportunities for small towns. The thing is, in order to access these gasses, a high quantity of methane and other toxic chemicals are released into the ground. These chemicals can contaminate the well water that feeds directly into peoples homes. Many people have gotten sick, but have no evidence that it was fracking that contaminated their water, or got them sick

I am against fracking, for more reasons than one. I am a sole believer that the country should be completely powered by clean energy. (windmills on Cape Cod, water turbines in Oregon/Washington, solar panels in Arizona)  Anything that pollutes should not be indulged in, because while the power we gain is convenient, we need to concentrate on getting the environment back on track. Fracking pollutes- so why bother? Our world should be our priority, we only have one of those.

Oil Drilling- is something that can endanger animals of all kinds. In the Gulf Coast Oil Spill, hundreds of animals were killed by the gallons of oil released into the ocean. Oil is a fossil fuel- which is made up of animals thousands of years old. We only have so much of it, and if we don't change our ways, we'll run out, probably before we're ready. (the question is- will it be too late by then?) Oil is used to power cars, a major polluting source. It is also used to make plastic, a material that takes hundreds of years to decompose when it's thrown out. 

I am against Oil drilling, because a mistake could be so destructive to our environment. Even if our willing is flawless, the oil goes to more polluting ways- it's destructive either way. I don't like things that could hurt any other organism, because I believe that all things have the right to live- no matter the form. The Gulf Coast Oil Spill lead to hundred of deaths of sea birds, sea mammals, and fish. By endangering an animals life we are selfish and corrupt.

Social Writing 3/3 poem: 2 voice poem, Alcoholism

I HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BY ALCOHOL 

My dad is an alcoholic

I've tried beer at a party

I KNOW I'LL NEVER

I would never drink

I'd never do shrooms, but maybe weed and alcohol 

I WISH 

My mother didn't have to cope with my dad

My mom wouldn't be so touchy when it comes to my friends

I HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY 

I have to make sure my father never abuses my younger sisters

I have to do the dishes, even when I have a lot of homework

I THINK ABOUT MY LIFE 

I want to go through college and become a cop

I think I want to go to college because I like to party

The poem is about alcoholism, and how someone's life can changed because of someone else. I feel that this is injustice because someone's life should not be altered by someone else's selfishness. 

I wanted the two voices to be different in more ways than one- by not only making the mundane voice have normal chores, but also be annoyed that s/he had to do dishes even with a lot of homework. I also tried to make the mundane voice be realistic, and casual, but I don't think anyone would ever admit they wanted to go to college just to party. I thought about the genders of my voices, but it was hard to envision. 

I think alcohol is a serious issue: underage kids often abuse alcohol and it can lead to serious injury or death. Drunk driving can lead to serious accidents, and on top of it all, it's a fluid that can make us sleepy, lead to birth defects, and irrational. It seems like a bad thing to engage in, though most people do. I'm not saying I won't drink-- but drinking sure is a silly thing to do. 

Social Writing 2/3 Poem

The grass I see isn't much
It could have been cool to the touch
so moist, so green, so lush
But we get some elastic
for grass can't grow
if it's plastic.

It's for the flowers I long
they come, portray their sweet song
but they are called wrong
and silly content
for flowers can't grow
on cement.

It's the trash that's making me gag
dirty cups, dirty spoons, dirty bags
through wrappers and napkins I wade
to get to a spot that has little known shade
so I wonder if,
they know what they've made:

A rat's nest of litter and stain.


The poem is about the astro turf outside the school that I have a lot of misgivings about.
I cannot force myself to write a poem. Usually, in a state near consciousness (dozing from or to sleep) I will think about my problems and think of solutions. In my case, I still hadn't gotten any homework done and was thinking about topics for my ELA assignments. I was mainly worried about my social issues piece: some work I didn't want to leave to the last minute but had no clue how to do. So the first two stanzas were drifting around me and I was thinking about the rhymes I would use. I was making mental notes on what issues about the astro turf I should use for my third stanza (I had a lot of ideas). I decided then I should get to a computer and start blogging, because mental notes don't stick around.
When I write poems, I write them because they can portray a certain vibe. I find that I can only do it if I respond throughout the poem to a certain rhythm. I have written many poems, only achieving this goal of mine once or twice. I never name my poems, because I don't think it's possible to classify a feeling with other words. So this poem will stay strong and defiant. That is the vibe I get from writing it even though it might not be the vibe you get from reading it.

Shakespear: Writing style of Hamlet

I was reading Hamlet, (as part of a drama assignment) and the writing style surprised me. Shakespear's writing sounds beautiful, but the words are hard to understand. It's not just the old english, but mainly the description is baffling. Said aloud, it is much more easily understood,but reading in your head is confusing, and it can seem like each character says something longer and more complex than the last one.

The thing I did like about Hamlet, was the description. The picture you are left with is lasting and expressive. I loved the metaphors and similes, and everything was intricately written, with a lot of care and it was very illustrative. One image that I remember is:

 "A mote is to trouble the minds eye. In the most high and palmy state of Rome, a little ere the mighty Julius fell the graves stood tenantless and the sheeted dead did squeak and gibber in the Roman streets, and stars with trains of fire and dews of blood, disasters in the sun and the moist star, upon whose influence Neptune's empire stands, was sick almost to doomsday with eclipse. And even the like precurse of feared events, as harbingers preceding still the fates and prologue to the omen coming on have Heaven and Earth together demonstrated unto our climates and countrymen."

In other words:
A little bit of dust can bother you. In Rome, right before Julius Ceaser's empire fell, the dead came back to life and comets fell and the sun and moon looked scary and there were eclipses, which was like this whole big omen that said the end of the world was coming, and a ghost said it would happen, so this ghost might have an important message for us.

The difference between the two paragraphs is drastic, but the two paragraphs mean the same thing. I like Shakespeare because event though the second paragraph is easier to understand, the first paragraph leaves a  lasting impression and keeps a reader remembering the message of the book.

The thing I don't like about Shakespear is that his characters don't portray as many human qualities. Of course, Shakespear didn't write books, he wrote plays, and factoring unique traits for the character isn't as important. But in comparison to Stephen King, William Shakespear's characters are bland and repetitive. You end up trying so hard to understand what the characters are talking about, that your focus on the story fades. The focus of the story isn't so focused on the characters are it is focused in the writing. It's interesting  how a writing style is adopted in that matter.

Social Issues 1/3 Imagine, By John Lennon

Imagine there's no Heaven 
It's easy if you try 
No hell below us 
Above us only sky 
Imagine all the people 
Living for today 

Imagine there's no countries 
It isn't hard to do 
Nothing to kill or die for 
And no religion too 
Imagine all the people 
Living life in peace 

You may say that I'm a dreamer 
But I'm not the only one 
I hope someday you'll join us 
And the world will be as one 

Imagine no possessions 
I wonder if you can 
No need for greed or hunger 
A brotherhood of man 
Imagine all the people 
Sharing all the world 

You may say that I'm a dreamer 
But I'm not the only one 
I hope someday you'll join us 
And the world will live as one 




The thing I like most about the song is the overlying message: that there is an alternative to this world we live in. It is a hopeful song. If we were to join together and agree upon peace, the world would be a much better place- so what's stopping us? Why do we hesitate to mend our dysfunctional ways? I think that we should respond to this song, because what it says is true. The human race has an unforgettable past of jealousy, greed, vanity, violence, and abuse. Our ways are obviously not correct if we are the one species that will kill each other for emotional reasons over money or status. We are the only race that breathes in smoke intentionally, we are the only race that exposes ourselves to harm just so we can escape the life we have created for ourselves. We are the only race that creates judgements, and decided to hurt each other because of the way the victim looks. 
So why do we do this? Why do we pollute? And judge? And corrupt? And abuse? Why are we selfish? Why can't we embrace that we need to respond to one of the many wake-up calls we've received?  I think it's clear we can't answer these questions. So why don't we respond, right now? The thing is, it will take everyone to respond to this cause, and a lot of people don't want to embrace the truth. They make up stories, and lies. And our world- the only one we have- is falling apart because of us. Maybe the alternative John Lennon talks about is something we ought to look into. 

Misery, Stephen King

Misery, Part 1: Metephors

The metaphors in Misery hold a very definitive place in the book. The book is about an author, Paul Sheldon's survival when he is taken captive by an insane women, Annie Wilks. Throughout the book, Paul makes a series of connections which I annotated in red. The first metaphor of the book is on page 3, in which Revere Beach is described, a piling that the tide would mask and unmask throughout the day. Paul later creates a metaphor responding to the memory. On page 8, "The pills were the tide; Annie Wilks was the lunar presence which pulled them into his mouth like a jetsam on a wave. she brought him two every six hours," I noticed also that the pilings were a negative aspect to his metaphor. Seeing the pilings meant that the tide was out, and that the Novril had worn off and his legs were hurting. He also used the Africa metaphor, in which he feels like a caged animal so far away from salvation. He was Annie's 'pet writer'.

Stephen King added these metaphors as part of Paul's character. Paul is a writer, thus he thinks like a writer and it's part of his character to make connections, analyze, symbolize. The metaphors will be introduced by a moment and then will be shown over and over. Slowly the metaphor becomes rounder, more truthful, and clearer.

Paul thinks of Annie as a goddess, not as a positive trait, but as an all-powerful, immortal, strong force that is against Paul's most definitive want: to be free of his captivity. In the climax of the book (spoiler alert) Paul is paranoid, "You are in error, Paul. You can't kill the goddess. The goddess is immortal. Now I must rinse." (see Misery: Part 4: Crazy)  He slowly becomes paranoid, and his metaphors become reality.

Misery, Part 2: Writing Style

Stephen King's writing style is very interesting. His characters are 3-D because of the details he includes. The metaphors and backgrounds are very human and his characters are all very different.  On page 153-154 Paul is having a writing moments. He has discovered the turning point of the book he is writing and in the notes Paul writes down, his voice is very clear, in the way most of our voice is clear when we think out loud. An example from the notes Paul writes down, "...they WERE related. Misery's an orph. And guess what? The Evelyn-Hyde babe was MISERY'S SISTER! Or maybe half sister. That would probably work better..." The thought process he went through was very defined and you could easily see his voice.

Stephen King does not use description at all times, which is good, because description can be over used, and there is a clear borderline between descriptive and boring, a borderline that is easily crossed. It's unfortunate when description looses it's beauty, and it takes a talented author to know not only enough about our society in order to create a character out of our lives, but a good author must also know enough about our society that they know about suspense as well as the patience a reader has for a part of a book. For instance, when I read Breaking Dawn by Stephanie Meyer, the second portion of the book in which Bella is a vampire and she goes out into the forest for the first time. Meyer spends a generous portion of the next two pages describing every single thing that Bella perceives with her new and improved vampire senses, which quickly becomes old and consuming.

 Stephen King also uses an intriguing paragraph structure in the end of the book, towards the climax. (viewer discretion advised)

see page 234

I want to note that while gruesome,  the paragraph has a very certain vibe around it because it is all one sentence. It portrays the idea that it all happened quickly.

Miserey, Part 3: Annotation

On page 65, Paul changes, a checkpoint is crossed. Paul begins to play a mind game with Annie, he begins to manipulate her. He confused her, and took advantage of her mental disability. I found that annotation was important at that point, because his tactic was becoming intricate.

Tactic:

His tactic, which he often referred to as Scheherazade was manipulative, but his only fault was that he manipulated Annie as a sane person, and not as a crazy person, which he did and succeeded with at the climax of the book. But on page 65, and again on page 67, he belittles Annie so that she feels confused and stupid. He described her face, which he described (see part 1 for other metaphors, recurring thoughts, and similes) as much as any other metaphor, as 'opaque' and 'childish'. But his tactics go far, he tricks Annie into a lot of things, especially things that end up (spoiler alert) aiding his escape in the end.   

Miserey, Part 4: Crazy

The book especially deals with Annie's deformed mental state, as well as Paul's mental state after his months in the captivity of a crazy women. Her Paranoia, and her homicidal tendencies. (spoiler alert) By the end of the book, when the officers find Paul, he is in a state near death, and he was very paranoid. Even after he is home, he is suffering from insomnia. On page 235, "Annie is good let us thank her for our food including that we don't have to eat girls just want to have fun but something wicked this way comes please don't make me eat my thumb Annie the mom Annie the goddess when Annie's around you had better stay honest she knows when you've been sleeping she knows when you're awake she knows when you've been good or bad so be good for goodness sake you better not cry you better not pout but most of all you better not scream don't scream don't scream don't scream don't" By the end of the book Paul is not insane, but he is scared and rattled, the way anyone would be if they went through what he did. On page 144, " You forgot didn't you? you forgot, just the way you keep forgetting to change February on that damned calender. Forgetting to make the quarterly property-tax payment is a hell of a lot more serious than forgetting to change the calender page, and your upset because this is the first time you've forgotten anything that big. Fact is, you're getting worse, Annie, aren't you? A little worse every day. Psychotics can cope in the world - after a fashion- and sometimes, as I think you well know, they get away with nasty shit. But there's a borderline between the lands of manageable and unmanageable psychosis. You're getting closer to that line every day...and part of you knows it." Annie is insane, and dangerously so. She is paranoid, and that paranoia leads her to (spoiler alert) cut off Paul's leg. "He knew that even a raving paranoid like Annie would reject what was so obvious..." Paul was also paranoid by the end of the book, but rightfully so. " There was an overstuffed sofa, and Annie was behind it. There was the kitchen door, and Annie was behind that. The floor boards creaked behind him...of course! Annie was behind him!" The crazy of Annie had begun to take over Paul. He jumped at every shadow, every sound. He was scared, because he was so close to his freedom.

Best Blog I've Seen.........As I See It

The best blogpost I've seen was Caroline's. Her blog post had an extreemly focussed theme, and each paragraph was intentionally construted. I really liked the meaning that was sorted out in the post, it really made me think about the book Caroline worte about. Her post was focused and stuck to a point that was well executed through her writing. I love the way her post turned out and I will try to learn from Caroline's
technique.